Category Archives: Apple

Good Night, Sweet Prince

Days to Centenary: 245

Today’s video is outstanding — simultaneously heartbreaking and hilarious. Ignore the video quality (it’s clearly a digitized videotape) — watch it!

Why?  Because even if you know plenty about Alan Turing’s wartime work, which is estimated to have shortened the war by several years (and perhaps even won it), and even if you know about him as the genius father of the computer and artificial intelligence, you can read about him and study him quite a bit without ever seeing certain of his traits as a man that are as impressive as anything he did militarily or intellectually.

This fragment of a documentary recounts the events leading up to Turing’s death, but in doing so it manages to highlight his wit, his poetic flourishes, and his incredible good humour, all of which appear to have persisted right up to the point where he ate the poison apple.

Behind the interview subjects, coming through in their anecdotes and their obvious love for him, you can almost see Turing himself: worrying, working, loving, and cackling with laughter (there’s a reason I chose a picture of Turing smiling, on the verge of laughter, to illustrate this site).

So, impressive trait number one:  he was a good-humoured and almost absurdly nice guy, even when persecuted, even when the chemical castration that was forced upon him made him sprout breasts.

Beyond his pleasan good nature, Turing also refused to lie about being gay in virtually all circumstances.  Certainly he didn’t advertise it (given that it was illegal), but by all accounts he was nontheless truthful about it, even (as we see here) when asked about it by police.

As hard as it can be to be honest about one’s sexuality even in 21st century Britain or America — especially in certain milieus, like corporate heirarchies or the military — I can’t quite imagine what it must have taken to live like that in the Britain of the 1940s and early 1950s, although the phrase “cojones of titanium” comes to mind.

So, impressive trait number two: even if a homophobic society sometimes depressed him, or even scared him, he refused to be cowed by it.

Unlike Turing’s achievements, these qualities — his good nature and his refusal to submit — are not unique to him.  These are characteristics that he shares with many LGBT folks (and members of other oppressed groups) throughout history, both great and ordinary.  But that doesn’t diminish these aspects of his personality.  What it does is include him in the long line of people who refused to allow the attitudes of others toward their orientation (or their sex, or their skin colour, or their religion) to stop them from getting on with their lives with pride, humour, love (and lust), and dignity.

If Turing’s intellectual achievements show us that he was an exceptional man, these other qualities show us that he was also a great example of the best in all men.

Two quick notes to give context to the video, then it’s time to watch:

Note one: Not everyone who’s interviewed is identified.  The jaunty fellow in the bowtie at the beginning is Norman Routledge, who was featured in a previous post.  Here we actually see and hear him reading the letter mentioned in that post, in which Turing announces that he’ll soon be pleading guilty to having had gay sex with a lover.  The letter ends with Turing’s worry that the following terrible syllogism would find support once he was publicly identified as gay:

  • Turing believes machines think
  • Turing lies with men
  • Therefore machines do not think

Note two:  The guy in the black leather jacket and moustache is Andrew Hodges, the outstanding biographer who has done so much to help resurrect Turing’s life and work and to rehabilitate his reputation in the mind of the general public after it was buried under secrecy, scandal, and ugly prejudice.  Hodges now serves on the Alan Turing Year Advisory Committee and maintains several web sites related to Turing, gay rights, and Hodges’ own work in physics.

Okay, enough from me — just watch.

Alan Turing and Steve Jobs

Days to Centenary: 259

Earlier this week Steve Jobs died at age 56. Jobs was co-founder, chairman, and chief executive officer of Apple Inc. and one of the most prominent figures in the technology community. His death has been marked by a flood of news items and countless tweets and has inspired some expansive rhetoric about Jobs’ place in the history of technology.

I respect Jobs’ achievements and I was surprisingly moved to hear about his death after so many false alarms in the news regarding his health. I have no desire to undermine his reputation and, unlike some people, I’m not sure that the characterization of him in the many memorials and obitiuaries that have followed his death is overblown or exaggerated.

What I would like to do — since this is an Alan Turing blog, not a Steve Jobs blog — is to use Jobs’ well-deserved reputation as a measure to help understand the scale of Alan Turing’s contributions to the world. For this, I turn to Slashdot.

Slashdot is a is a technology-related news website owned by Geeknet, Inc. The site, which bills itself as “News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters”, features user-submitted and ‑evaluated current affairs news stories about science- and technology-related topics. In 2010 Slashdot consulted with its readers, conducting a poll on their respect for various figures in the history of the development of technology. What did the results look like?

Slashdot poll results on respected historical figures in tehcnology

Slashdot poll results on respected historical figures in tehcnology

It may not be an objective measurement of anything (other than the self-reported state of mind of Slashdot’s readership at a given moment), and it likely has no statistical significance, but the poll neatly sums up at least a general sense of where Alan Turing stands in relation to other innovators in the history of technology.

Since we’re in the midst of a swell of attention to, and emotion about, Steve Jobs, this historical moment gives us a unique chance to assess just what kind of grief ought to have attended Turing’s death, and what honour would immediately have been accorded to his memory, had the world known more about his contributions at the time and cared less about his sexuality, seen for many years through the distorting lens of prejudice and foolishness. Just look around you at the news items about Steve Jobs, at the commotion and emotion, and watch for the many books and other tributes that will follow after the initial aftermath has subsided, and multiply it by a factor of your choosing in order to scale it up to Turing’s level.

We stupidly missed our chance to pay him our respects properly when he died — maybe the Turing Year in 2112, celebrating his centennial, will be a chance for us to make up for that failure.

Now, to close with a Mythbusters moment regarding Turing and Jobs: there’s a persistent myth that the Apple logo — a silhouette of an apple with a bite out of it, strikingly coloured with the rainbow that has become iconic of the GLBT rights movement — is a tribute to Alan Turing, gay computer pioneer dead by poisoned apple. It’s so beautiful that one wishes it were true, but it’s not.